The following link (I couldn't get the video to embed) will take you to the Fiber Once Brownie commercial we discussed in class. This is an excellent example of a company releasing a campaign online because they felt it was to risky to release as a comprehensive campaign.
http://youtu.be/vK7hZ9CxCfU
To learn more about the campaign check out the website:
http://www.magicbrownieadventure.com/
This is a blog for class members to continue in-class discussions, to introduce new topics and post ads of interest.
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
How Toyota Tundra Killed Truck ads
Nissan ads. Some have very poor production values making it extremely obvious it's not real. If you are going to do this in this day and age, at least get some good production.
This one at least looks somewhat real.
The Toyota ads that have killed any "demo" that is not real for me. I am also reminded of these ads every time I see a truck ad that is not real.
Sunday, December 4, 2011
In advance of class Tues, Dec 6 (St. Nicholas)
"Linus and Lucy" aka The Charlie Brown Christmas Dance
Friday, December 2, 2011
Pepsi Refresh campaign... A year later
Interesting to see this project come a long way. Pepsico is now advertising the Refresh campaign. Click the link below to see a few of the ads.
Pepsi Refresh Ads
Wonder if we'll see Pepsico advertise the Refresh campaign in the 2012 Superbowl??
Pepsi Refresh Ads
Wonder if we'll see Pepsico advertise the Refresh campaign in the 2012 Superbowl??
Sunday, November 27, 2011
ESPN Cognitive Dissonance
ESPN is known for having great commercials. One website even compiled a list of the Top 50 ESPN commercials of all time.
However, an ESPN commercial I recently saw may be the best example of cognitive dissonance I have ever seen in advertising. The commercial essentially raises the question of how NASCAR drivers use the restroom during a race without resolving the issue.
I believe the power of the commercial lies in successfully walking two fine lines. The commercial is general enough that the audience understands the issue but specific enough that it feels like an inside joke. In addition, it is uncomfortable enough to grab a viewer's attention ("I have to know!") but not discomfortable to the point that it turns the audience off. It simply gets the viewer to further engage with the sport and ESPN even if, like me, the persuadee is not a NASCAR fan!
Click here for the answer!
However, an ESPN commercial I recently saw may be the best example of cognitive dissonance I have ever seen in advertising. The commercial essentially raises the question of how NASCAR drivers use the restroom during a race without resolving the issue.
I believe the power of the commercial lies in successfully walking two fine lines. The commercial is general enough that the audience understands the issue but specific enough that it feels like an inside joke. In addition, it is uncomfortable enough to grab a viewer's attention ("I have to know!") but not discomfortable to the point that it turns the audience off. It simply gets the viewer to further engage with the sport and ESPN even if, like me, the persuadee is not a NASCAR fan!
Click here for the answer!
Saturday, November 19, 2011
Video for ODF Case (in case Concourse post of video fails to work)
In case the file on Concourse doesn't work on your computer, here are the ODF case videos / ads; they are mentioned in the case
"Testimonial"
"Current Campaign"
"Compare Itself"
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Bad Ad Good Ad
Here's an interesting blog with some creative examples of good advertising and bad advertising: http://badadgoodad.com/
Saturday, November 12, 2011
Viral Ads and ROI
The company that I interned with was in the midst of putting together a product launch this past summer. They made three videos for Youtube and were able to get over a million hits for one. See it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mv9GDp0G3oE All things being equal, do you think that the views of TV ads and Youtube ads have the same value? If not, which is better?
Thursday, November 10, 2011
Google Chrome Ad: Dear Sophie
Watch this wonderful ad for Google Chrome / Google. This is their second television ad ("Paris" was the first). Here, we see Google continue to use Chrome to change its position from search engine to platform for the web. "The web is what you make of it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4vkVHijdQk
For AdAge discussion of the ad, click here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4vkVHijdQk
For AdAge discussion of the ad, click here
Absolut Vodka
Level Vodka, a brand of vodka from the makers of Absolut was launched in 2004. Made in Åhus, Sweden, the vodka is made from winter wheat and is marketed as "perfectly balanced" due to the use of two distinct distillation methods - a continuous distillation process to remove congeners, creating the vodka's smoothness, and a batch distillation process to add character.
Level was launched as a direct competitor to Grey Goose.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Internet Ads
It seems to me that internet ads tend to run on the more provocative/controversial side of things. Take this following ad by Red Bull (though abosolutely hilarious):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0b3OPo9wHuk.
I have not seen this ad on television, so I am assuming this is an internet only ad. Nevertheless, do you all think internet ads are more provocative/controversial than cable television? If so, whats the reasoning behind it? I think it might have something to do with the FCC having less regulatory power in policing internet ads.
If this proposition is true, then it begs the question: If people accept provocative/controversial ads on the internet, why are they not acceptable on cable television? At first one might think it is because cable reaches a larger and wider audience, but I believe this theory to be false. Even the elderly and young have access to and use the internet now on a regular basis. Thoughts?
-Ricky
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0b3OPo9wHuk.
I have not seen this ad on television, so I am assuming this is an internet only ad. Nevertheless, do you all think internet ads are more provocative/controversial than cable television? If so, whats the reasoning behind it? I think it might have something to do with the FCC having less regulatory power in policing internet ads.
If this proposition is true, then it begs the question: If people accept provocative/controversial ads on the internet, why are they not acceptable on cable television? At first one might think it is because cable reaches a larger and wider audience, but I believe this theory to be false. Even the elderly and young have access to and use the internet now on a regular basis. Thoughts?
-Ricky
Monday, November 7, 2011
Guest Speaker for Nov 8
The guest speaker tomorrow in class is Scott Griffith, VP, Planning Director, Energy BBDO, Chicago Scott.Griffith@energybbdo.com - check out his work at his company's web site here
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
External Advertising Speaker
Tomorrow November 11th Phillip Raskin the Vice Chairman of Leo Burnett and previous CMO of Morgan Stanley will be speaking to the MBA Marketing Club on how to evaluate advertisements in Room 160. This is a great opportunity for all of us to increase our marketing knowledge and learn more about advertising. Everyone is welcome to attend. Lunch will be provided.
Monday, October 31, 2011
Ugliest part of advertising?
The political ad season is just starting and I think at times it can be one of the ugliest parts of advertising. The ads are personal, slanderous, and can be down right dirty. Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem like there is an end in sight because these ads have been proven to work. I thought this was an interesting article about a father-in-law who spent millions to develop several attack ads on his son-in-laws opponent for Kentucky governor. http://factcheck.org/2011/10/a-father-in-laws-attack-ads/
Sunday, October 30, 2011
BMW Z4 Ad
I had remembered it wrong. I knew the piece had been somewhere you could see it. It was up in Grand Central Terminal for awhile. I saw it while I was living back in New York.
The documentary was aired on Discovery TV.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Advertising Authors I like
Grant McCracken - http://cultureby.com/
and his books; I've listed two here: Culture and Consumption (1990), and Chief Culture Officer (2011)
I also like Bob Garfield, who wrote an influential column in AdAge for quite a long time.
and his books; I've listed two here: Culture and Consumption (1990), and Chief Culture Officer (2011)
I also like Bob Garfield, who wrote an influential column in AdAge for quite a long time.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Dr, Pepper Ten
The funny thing here is that they are also supposedly getting tripped up by the FDA rounding rules. If you read through the comments, you'll also notice the problem with their marketing campaign. There is a tremendous amount of bad will being built up against the thrust of their campaign.
The tongue in cheek nature of their ads is offending a lot of people or making them dislike the product simply because the ads are pretty stupid.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)